« El Bulli vs Can Roca - A lesson learned | Main | LA PERGOLA IN ROME »
October 21, 2005
Troisgros - One of the temples of haute cuisine
Troisgros is one of my favourite restaurants. There is little not to like with the fantastic often simple yet at the same time sophisticated cuisine prepared with top class ingredients, the elegant cool and cosy interior and the practically faultless service provided by some of the most experienced, friendly and casual waiters on the French haute cuisine circuit. I almost
forgot something important, actually for many it is one of the top motivating factors for travelling to Troisgros. Troisgros also possesses one of the best wine lists in the world. It is among the best from almost every aspect. There are few wine lists as deep as that of Troisgros and as packed with mature wines from great producers. Even more important, many wines are offered at bargain prices, in some cases at a fraction of the current market prices. What do you say about 120 euros for 1993 Clos de la Roche Vielles Vignes from Ponsot? It was one of the wines we had at Troisgros at the most recent dinner and one of the bottles we had was as good as any red Burgundy I have ever had. Yes, on par with the 1990 Henri Jayer Vosne-Romanée Cros Parentoux.
The meal started with a few amuses and 1992 les Clos from Raveneau, which had started to show the waxy character that many adore in Raveneau's wines. The amuses were perhaps not particularly interesting and slightly overly marked by Michel Troisgros’s passion for acidity elements in food or as he calls it, cuisine acidulé.
The acidity theme also started the meal with the Acidulé de tomate and it was an ingenious dish showcasing that perfect touch that Michel Troisgros often has in his preparation when he manages to marry acidity and a slight sweetness with spices to achieve a sublime and complex result that still show the purity and clarity of the main ingredient, in this case the tomatoes.
The preparation consisted of several elements of tomatoes such as small confit tomatoes, some diced tomatoes and a divine jelly of tomato water lightly infused with mint leaves and coriander seeds. The light infusion with some added sugar and Xeres vinegar resulted in a dazzling preparation. Many at the table sensed a hint of a taste they somehow recognised in the perfect jelly that melted almost instantly on the tongue and the taste elevated the tomatoes in the preparation to a new level. - Maybe it is tea, someone said. It was a great dish. Simple, yet sophisticated and it perfectly showed the superb tomatoes and even enhancing them by giving them a new taste angle or a new dimension that complemented the true taste of tomatoes.
The next dish, Huitres creuses en gelée de bettrave fumée was as good even if the taste combination as such was not particularly new to me.
Three poached then cooled Gillardeau oyster, which I initially thought were #3's, but I was later corrected by Michel that they were #2's, sat in another perfect jelly this time made with smoked beet roots that melted on the tongue. The smokiness was just barely traceable. As with most Troisgros dishes today, the beet jelly had a light tanginess to it from some added acidity, that in this dish was perhaps ever so slightly too pronounced for my taste buds, but it was still another great dish. Beets and oysters is a very interesting combination when well executed, especially with the Gillardeau oysters with their long and exceptional taste. The perfect element to enhance this combination even further is truffles. Yes, both white Alba truffles and black melanosporums. For the adventurous, a hint of nutmeg with the oysters, beets and the white truffles can to some be breath taking when rightly calibrated.
A few of the diners got frog’s legs instead of the oysters and while the spicing went well with the cauliflower, the somewhat overcooked frog’s legs were slightly lost in the preparation.
The 1986 Batard Montrachet from Domaine Leflaive served with these dishes brought back great memories from the 1986 vintage and also showed that well stored bottles of great white Burgundy can age for a very long time. The wine was really singing and did not show any sign of age.
Next up on the menu was a pan-fried foie gras and while there was little to say about the cooking of the foie gras, the foie gras was not of the best quality. Maybe it was just an atypical liver but it reminded more both in texture and flavour of cheap supermarket foie gras, which I am sure Michel Troisgros does not serve, so it must have been an odd liver. The acidity element provided by the rhubarb and ginger was quite nice however.
Since the French scallops season has just started, it was of course unthinkable to eat at Troisgros without sampling one dish featuring this fantastic and noble ingredient that still remains relatively modestly priced. The Noix de Saint Jacques poelees & condiment safrane was good but not on par with other scallops preparations of Troisgros. There were some pine nuts in the vinaigrette-like sauce and that complemented nicely the somewhat nutty taste of pan-fried scallops that is to die for. Much better are Troisgros hazelnut and rosemary fried scallops. The scallops were of very good quality even if I tend to think they get a little better later in the season and they and the dish were without a doubt much better than the quite average, or even mediocre dish with scallops served at Regis Marcon a few days earlier.
Michel Troisgros is known for his love of Asian spicing and often find inspiration from Asian cooking and this was displayed in the next dish, Fricassé d'ecrevisses, navet fin, sucs de caisson corsés. When these Asian inspired dishes work, they can be fantastic, but when they do not, the result can be quite average. Even if the crayfish were of exceptional quality, their qualities were completely masked by the spicing. Unfortunately this crayfish dish gave about as much inspiration as food from almost any simple Asian takeaway.
Troisgros is certainly a great place for meat and with the game season just started, Michel Troisgros have lots of produce available that are naturally suited for combinations marked by sweetness and acidity.
The venison was of very good quality and at an aging point that I like. The taste was a nicely developed but balanced taste of game but not too strong or oxidised and not marked by the taste of oxidised meat, like game meat that has been poorly stored or aged for too long, that often is the case. The garnish featuring mirabelles and hazelnuts was virtually perfect. The only objection I would have against the dish would be the slight undercooking of the venison.
The cheese table at Troisgros is superb and offers a great selection surpassed by few. Troisgros uses two local affineurs, most importantly Hervé Mons who certainly ranks among one of the top affineurs in France for certain chesses most notably in my opinion his Camenbert which at a peak affinage can resemble the smell of a great example of an Alba truffle. But as with most affineurs, Hervé Mons has his weak spots, most notably the vieux comté that is not even a pale shadow of the comté of Bernard Antony. The cheese board at Troisgros can offer up to 20 different cheeses all in perfect or close to perfect condition. Having cheese at Troigros is a pure joy and only rivalled by few restaurants.
I think that Troisgros can excel in their desserts. The marriage of lightness, richness, sweetness and often acidity can provide divine results. This time that was not really the case. The first of the two desserts was Louise-bonne à la "Belle Hélène" and it was quite bland. The pear was somewhat diluted in taste and the bitter almond enhanced sauce effectively killed the dish. The Flan au caramel, sablé à la mangue that followed was clearly better but still not really more than an assemblage of some fruits and diary products. It is hard to single out any restaurant that is a match to the almost always near perfect or perfect desserts at Le Louis XV that have perhaps forever spoilt my taste buds.
Another great wine that was tasted during the meal apart from the ones mentioned above was 1993 Chambertin from Rousseau. While no match for the Ponsot, still a great Burgundy that started to show signs of maturity.
Troisgros is a highly recommended restaurant where one can eat absolutely sublime meals at the very top. This meal was very good but due to a bit too many mistakes, it was well below what they are capable of delivering. But it dis show the great flow of a meal at Troisgros and the deep and vast repertoire of Michel Troisgros. Perhaps Michel Troisgros is moving more and more in the direction of the cuisine acidulé and using too much spicing in his dishes with the result that some ingredients are lost. I hope that is not the case. When the acidity element is not in balance, the preparation can easily be anything but joyful to eat in contrast to when it is balanced and the acidity manages to provide a new dimension to a preparation. Since the difference in calibration between the two results is hair thin, it is perhaps too demanding to expect perfection all the time from such a risk-taking chef as Michel Troisgros.
It will be interesting to see what Vedat thinks about the current form of Troisgros as he is having dinner there today.
Gastroville Rating of this meal: 17,5/20
/MJ
Comments
Mikael,
glad to read you again. Please tell us about the Auberge de Clos et Cimes.
Francesco
Posted by: Francesco at October 22, 2005 10:56 PM
Francesco,
There are a lot of posts to catch up on but I may write something next week. Regis Marcon was not what you expect for the money and I do not see it as just a bad day for the kitchen. His new restaurant has a lovely setting even if the dining room has a corporate high-level staff restaurant feeling over it.
Posted by: Mikael at October 23, 2005 11:04 PM
Thanks for the very nice review. I was at Troisgros at the beginning of September and had some similar feelings. A wonderful meal with a few mis-steps because of the risk taking. Interestingly, the main dissapointment was a chinese-ish lobster dish with chili oil that really didn't do much - the lobster was a touch overcooked and the seasoning didn't add anything. Have you had more succesful asian shellfish dishes there? I was a little underwhelmed by the cheese as well, to my suprise, a wonderful epoisse aside they seemed a bit dull. That said, everything else was pretty stellar, especially a rouget with jus d'arrete which was pheneomenally intense.
Was Yuzu the kitten terrorizing the dining room? That was nearly as entertaining as the food.
Posted by: alexhills at October 26, 2005 02:08 PM
Mikael,
I hope you do get around to give some more details about the Auberge. I have never been and for a few years the press was extremely favorable. Recently, however, I have read and heard less and less enthusiasm for this place: it sounds like I will have to take it off my "to do" list.
Posted by: Francesco at October 26, 2005 06:06 PM
My last dinner there is on October 21 Friday.
Unfortunately I fared less well than Mikael.
I am trying to play a little mental trick to myself.
Suppose I knew nothing about the ranking of this
restaurant and its history. Suppose it was an unknown
place in a non-descript city. What would I have said?
First, I would have praised the wine list. 95 Coche
Meursault Perrieres and 93 Ponsot Clos de la Roche VV.
The latter for 130 Euro. Great choices and fair
prices.
But unfortunately, the cooking, though promising for a
young chef did not match the excellence of the wines.
Personally I like acidity in my dishes and I did not
mind the (slightly too much) reliance on it. But I
found the chef's attempts at "fusion" unconvincing. He
unfortunately destroyed some very good "ecrevisse
patte rouge" with too much ginger and tamarind.
The chef seems to have a sweet tooth too. He
counterbalances acidity with sweetness in the scallop,
oyster and escargot dishes. But it is doubtful that we
end up with an harmonious balance when we combine two
extremes. But maybe smokers or the lovers of Thai food
will appreciate these preparations more than I did.
But I have appreciated the reliance on good, carefully
chosen products. Fresh breton scallops, #2 Gillardeau
oysters, very good ecrevisse, plump escargots which
are local(mostly imported from other countries now).
My venison was not as good as Mikael's. Had I not
known what it is, I would not have guessed. It had the
soggy texture and sterile taste of a long cooked beef.
Was it "sous vide"? I have not asked.
Cheese course was very good but desserts only average.
The sommelier seemed to have agreed with me that this
was not a particularly special show. But he said that
I should not have ordered the menu deg. I actually
usually don't but here I somehow did. He told me that
scallops with hazelnut, crisp ceps and squab Kiev are
outstanding. OK. Next time I hope.
When I paid the bill I noticed that they really charge
huge premiums for phone calls. Hotels in Europe
usually do not do this. It seems like they have
adapted American hotel tricks. Have they also
concocted the menu deg. for an international
clientele?
Posted by: Vedat at April 13, 2006 05:31 PM



